Performance Evaluation – Explanations of Ratings

September, 2008

 

What do the ratings mean?

 

County Support Staff – Secretaries, Program Assistants and Office Staff 

The Performance Evaluation system uses a 4-point rating scale.  The meaning of the ratings is as follows:

 

 4 = Exceeds Expectations

·        clearly and consistently exceeds the results expected

·        contributes to organization's success well beyond expectations

·        contributes unique, innovative, workable solutions to projects and/or problems

·        exceptional performance and effort are the employee's norm

 

3 = Meets Expectations (This is the level employees should strive to reach.)

·        consistently achieves the results expected

·        results are timely and accurate and are produced with minimum supervision

·        employee recognized, adjusts well to changes in work situations & assignments

·        solid, fully competent performance is the employee's norm

 

 2 = Needs Improvement

·         performance does not consistently meet results expected

·         performance needs improvement in areas of consistent weakness

·         employee requires guidance and supervision to meet expectations 

 

1 = Unsatisfactory

·        consistently fails to meet results expected

·        performance is unsatisfactory

·        fails to follow directions and improve performance

·        corrective action must be taken and monitored

·        if employee fails to improve, disciplinary action may be recommended

 

County Support Staff – Nutrition Education Program Assistants

The Performance Evaluation system uses a 5-point rating scale.  The meaning of the ratings is as follows:

 

5 = Outstanding

·         clearly and consistently exceeds the job standards

·         contributes to organization’s success well beyond expectations

·         contributes unique, innovative and workable solutions to projects and/or problems

·         exceptional performance and effort are the employee’s norm

 

4 = Exceeds Expectations above minimum standards

·        consistently achieves the results expected

·        results are timely and accurate and are produced with minimum supervision

·        employee recognizes and adjusts well to change in work situations and assignments

·        competent performance with minimal guidance

 

3 = Meets Expectations (This is the level employees should strive to reach)

·        meets minimum standards required for the job

·        consistently achieves the minimum standards set for job goals and objectives

·        performance meets results expected

 

2 = Needs Improvement

·         performance does not consistently meet minimum standards

·         performance needs improvement in areas of consistent weakness

·         employee requires guidance and supervision to meet expectations

 

1 = Unacceptable

·        consistently fails to meet results expected

·        performance is unsatisfactory

·        fails to follow directions and improve performance

·        corrective action must be taken and monitored

·        if employee fails to improve, disciplinary action may be recommended